Viewing entries in
Supreme Court

D3 Daily Action

D3 Daily Action

Monday's D3 Daily Action

Advocate for a filibuster for Grouch’s nomination TODAY!

The Senate Judiciary Committee met Monday to consider Gorsuch's nomination, but as expected, Democrats requested that the nomination be held for one week, so the committee is expected to vote Monday, April 3

Republicans, who number 52 in the Senate, need eight Democrats to join them in order to end the expected filibuster, or in more technical terms, invoke cloture. 

    This Action must be done Today and ASAP! Call Now!:

    Senator Bennett:  970-259-1710 or 303-455-7600
    Senator Gardner: 970-245-9553 or 303-391-5777

    Script: Hi. I’m from _ZIP_ and am calling to ask _NAME_ to join with other Democrats in pushing for a more moderate Supreme Court pick than Gorsuch. How does _NAME_ plan to block this extreme nominee? (While you’re on the phone, go on to the next one…).

    More information on this D3 Daily Action can be found here.


    D3 Daily Action

    D3 Daily Action

    Friday's D3 Daily Action

    Gorsuch Photo courtesy of Getty Images

    Gorsuch Photo courtesy of Getty Images

    Call Senator Michael Bennet and Senator Cory Gardner to urge them to reject Donald Trump’s Arch-Conservative SCOTUS Pick

    Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacant seat on the United States Supreme Court. Judge Gorsuch does not belong on the Supreme Court—and not just because Republicans stole this seat by refusing to hold a hearing (let alone a vote!) for Merrick Garland, President Obama’s supremely well qualified and moderate nominee. Judge Gorsuch is a staunch conservative out of step with the American people. 

    Neil Gorsuch has routinely put the interests of employers, institutions, and big business ahead of average Americans. When a company fired a trucker for leaving his cargo to seek help in subzero temperatures—after the man waited long enough for his torso to go numb—Judge Gorsuch sided with the company. When a professor recovering from cancer was fired after requesting a short period of telecommuting to protect her fragile health from a flu epidemic on campus, Judge Gorsuch concluded that her modest request imposed an unfair demand that her employer provide a “safety net.” He also wants to judges to have greater liberty  to substitute their own uninformed views for those of scientists, economists, and other technical experts who spent years meticulously crafting data-driven rules to protect our air, water, health, and safety. He’s no champion of free and fair government, either: he has been unwilling to stand up publicly against Donald Trump’s vicious attacks on federal judges and supports an extreme view that common sense restrictions on campaign contributions should be struck down unless they satisfy “strict scrutiny”--the most difficult test the Supreme Court applies, and the same one used to protect our most sacred, fundamental rights.

    In what is probably Judge Gorsuch’s most famous case, he conjured up the new theory that for-profit corporations have a right to religious freedom. This right had traditionally been reserved for individuals, houses of worship, and other religious non-profits, and Judge Gorsuch’s philosophy theory radically expands on the fiction that big businesses are people with rights as important—or even more important—than actual people. Judge Gorsuch believes that business should be able to impose their religious beliefs on their employees—even when doing so means depriving those employees of basic health care—and they should be able to use their “religious beliefs” to avoid the laws that protect the rest of us. But it’s not clear whether his expansive view of religious freedom extends beyond big business to protect, for example, Muslims’ constitutional right to an equal place in our society. 

    Senate Republicans have already been playing games with the Supreme Court for over a year. They only have a seat to fill today because of their unprecedented obstruction and breach of protocol last year. And those same Republicans, who used Senate procedures to block fair consideration of Merrick Garland, threaten to change the Senate rules to silence Democrats, unless Democrats rubber stamp thee far-right, anti-worker, anti-women friend of big business and big donors they have picked for the Court. Specifically, there is talk that Republicans will resort to the “nuclear option” of scrapping the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations. With the centuries-old filibuster, any nominee requires support of 60 of our 100 senators, which nearly always means a nominee must have support from at least some senators on either side of the aisle. Without it, bare partisan preferences could select the next justice and all who follow.

    Decisions Senators make today about who to put on the Court and how Supreme Court appointments are made will affect our democratic system for decades to come. The Supreme Court will continue to hear cases on critical issues, from protecting minority rights to ensuring free, fair, and democratic elections. And political games Republicans may play would threaten the dignity, impartiality, and legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Senators who oppose Judge Gorsuch’s nomination, or are wavering, need our support and encouragement to demand a more moderate, consensus pick. And senators who support Gorsuch need to hear that their constituents will not tolerate short-sighted power grabs that undermine the Court in the long run. 

    So far, Democrats have been indecisive and quiet in their response to Judge Gorsuch’s nomination. Together, let’s make sure that they hear our demand for a moderate justice who reflects American values—and that Donald Trump and Republican leaders remember they are accountable to their constituents, who deserve a fair, bipartisan confirmation process that doesn’t put extremists on the Court.

    Call your Senators today and tell them you don’t support Donald Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court.